In November, I’m presenting a paper tentatively titled “The Electric Kool-Aid Turing Test” at this conference in Brighton, England. My argument is that emerging paradigms in research on the use of psychedelic drugs as psychotherapeutic tools problematize machine learning.
This is pulled from my abstract:
The paper draws from interdisciplinary scholarship that uses qualitative methods to interpret research on psychedelics as psychotherapeutic tools. I combine precepts of machine learning with developments in psychedelic research to explore the complexities of generalizing findings, which includes accounts from those undergoing “ineffable” and difficult- to-predict experiences — for data modeling. In doing so, I demonstrate that the use of qualitative methods in psychedelic drug research may offer useful insights to the field of machine learning… [later] I explore axioms of machine learning that emphasize the ways in which generalization and inductive reasoning are used to build algorithms that effectively “predict” the future. Here I partially draw on the work of Pedro Domingos, whose research explores how machine learning generalizes “beyond” finite data sets. Joining emerging paradigms from psychedelic research and machine learning, I offer that the former can help the latter a) account for difficult-to- predict phenomena and b) understand its possible limitations.
The turn toward interpretation and qualitative approaches is the “emerging paradigm” in psychedelic research to which I refer. Scholarly work has been published very recently that foregrounds qualia and subjectivity in clinical trials with psychedelics. Furthermore, some scholars emphasize that philosophy is implicated in the outcome of these trials, and that the answer to why psychedelics are effective at treating mental illness may be entangled with traditionally philosophical concerns.
I’m fully in the throes of this project now. It may become part of my dissertation. I hope it does, but as folks in higher ed know, a lot of of that is beyond my control. Honestly, the fact that psychedelic research is so controversial will make this work, complicated as it already is, all the more difficult.
There’s a lot to say. Connections that have to be more than a serendipitous agreement. More than apophenia. I’m indexing them.
The Virginia Tech library doesn’t have an extensive amount of material on psychedelic science, but they do have a copy of Albert Hoffman’s LSD: My Problem Child I’m going to check out before I leave here today…